Bitcoin protocol developer Casey Rodarmor has strongly reiterated his opposition to censoring transactions on the blockchain, together with controversial media inscriptions enabled by his personal Ordinals mission.
In a biting new weblog put up, Rodarmor excoriated ideological maximalists inside the Bitcoin neighborhood as hypocrites for supporting censorship whereas concurrently professing Bitcoin as “unstoppable” cash immune from meddling.
Pricey ideological Bitcoin maxis,
I wrote a weblog put up on the way to suck much less.
— Casey (@rodarmor) December 30, 2023
Rodarmor Defends Bitcoin Ordinals In opposition to Censorship Calls
Rodarmor argued that attempts to censor Bitcoin ordinals could open the door to broader censorship efforts, contending nothing can feasibly cease individuals from leveraging Bitcoin’s transparency.
He believes maximalists uncomfortably reject actuality when attacking performance past funds.
Rodarmor contends the fact is that nothing can feasibly cease individuals from leveraging the blockchain’s transparency for functions maximalists deem frivolous or illegitimate, like inscribing arbitrary pictures and messages.
He believes the maximalist need to limit Bitcoin’s use stems from an “uncomfortable contact with a actuality” that fails to match their ideological imaginative and prescient. This causes them to reactively assault something that expands performance past funds.
Whereas detached about defending inscriptions themselves, Rodarmor categorically rejects technocratic tinkering to dam any legitimate transactions, regardless of how objectionable. For him, sustaining “uncensorable” as a core attribute of Bitcoin overrides different concerns.
Embracing Bitcoin Ordinals’ Market Potential
As a substitute, Rodarmor proposes permitting free market dynamics to naturally decide the worth of inscriptions and different functions competing for restricted block house.
He claims the inevitable answer is excessive on-chain charges pricing out lower-value makes use of like trivial media.”Bitcoin’s future is excessive charges. Embrace it,” Rodarmor wrote.
He suggested maximalists to “cease being losers” by redirecting efforts towards increasing Bitcoin’s attain and real-world utilization moderately than hampering new functionalities.
In the end, Rodarmor believes the trail to cryptocurrency’s mass acceptance requires embracing outside-the-box enhancements on top of Bitcoin and letting its full, dynamic potential unfold. Limiting potentialities dangers turning an open platform right into a slender orthodoxy.
At its core, Rodarmor makes a compelling case for letting the free market run its course. If Bitcoin is to meet its future as an open, decentralized ledger, the neighborhood should resist the urge to over-engineer each perceived downside.
With a spirit of openness and a steadiness of pragmatism, Bitcoin can transfer past a radical concept into a world pressure for financial freedom.